Fast Tracking E-Commerce
The 3rd Gen AMD EPYC™ CPU based servers propels e-commerce by delivering 50% more transaction processing than the latest 2-socket system from the competition¹. With the high core-density of EPYC, e-commerce infrastructure can service more customers with the same number of servers.
VMware Confidential Containers Enabled With AMD SEV-ES
VMware extends vSphere support of AMD EPYC™ Secure Encrypted Virtualization - Encrypted State (SEV-ES) with 7.0 U2. New in 7.0 U2 is SEV-ES security protection for confidential vSphere Pods. Customers running vSphere 7.0 U2 with Tanzu on AMD EPYC™ 2nd and 3rd generation processors now have added levels of security for VMs and Containers/Pods. The demo in this session illustrates the ease of securing a vSphere Pod with SEV-ES while running on Milan.

Proven Performance and Energy Efficiency
Achieve exceptional price performance and power savings with proven 3rd Gen AMD EPYC™ processors.1

Stay Connected
Sign up to receive the latest data center news or get in touch with an AMD Sales representative.
Notas al pie
- MLNX-017: Altair® Radioss® 2021.2 comparison based on AMD internal testing as of 02/14/2022 measuring the time to run the dropsander, neon, and t10m test case simulations Configurations: 2x 32C AMD EPYC 7573X with AMD 3D V-Cache™ versus 2x 32C Intel® Xeon® Platinum 8362. neon is the max result. Results may vary based on factors including silicon version, hardware and software configuration and driver versions.
- MLNX-010A: ANSYS® CFX® 2022.1 comparison based on AMD internal testing as of 02/14/2022 measuring the average time to run the cfx_10, cfx_50, cfx_100, cfx_lmans, and cfx_pump test case simulations. Configurations: 2x 32C AMD EPYC™ 7573X with AMD 3D V-Cache technology™ versus 2x 32C Intel Xeon Platinum 8362. Cfx_10 is the max result. Results may vary based on factors including silicon version, hardware and software configuration and driver versions.
- 2x AMD EPYC 75F3 (32C) performs up to ~1.98x the [~58% more on average across all tested workloads] LS-DYNA® crash simulation jobs/day PER CORE on 3cars than a 2x Intel Xeon Gold 6258R (28C) MLN-049.
- MLNX-001A: EDA RTL Simulation comparison based on AMD internal testing completed on 9/20/2021 measuring the average time to complete a test case simulation. comparing: 1x 16C EPYC™ 7373X with AMD 3D V-Cache Technology versus 1x 16C AMD EPYC™ 73F3 on the same AMD “Daytona” reference platform. Results may vary based on factors including silicon version, hardware and software configuration and driver versions.
- WRF version 4.1.5 forecasts per day comparison based on AMD internal testing completed on 2/17/2021 on a reference platform with 2x EPYC™ 75F3 (32C) compared to an Intel server on a production system with 2x Intel® Xeon® Gold 6258R (28C) processors. Results may vary. MLN-043
- Hadoop Sort SPARK 1TB comparison based on AMD internal testing on Cloudera 6.3.1 and VMware EXSi 6.7u3 as of 02-15-2021. Configurations: server with 2x AMD EPYC 7543 versus a server with 2x Intel Xeon Gold 6258R for 25.2% more [1.3x the] performance. TPCx-HS 100GB Scale Factor workload cannot be compared to published TPC results. Results may vary. MLN-051
- MLNX-017: Altair® Radioss® 2021.2 comparison based on AMD internal testing as of 02/14/2022 measuring the time to run the dropsander, neon, and t10m test case simulations Configurations: 2x 32C AMD EPYC 7573X with AMD 3D V-Cache™ versus 2x 32C Intel® Xeon® Platinum 8362. neon is the max result. Results may vary based on factors including silicon version, hardware and software configuration and driver versions.
- MLNX-010A: ANSYS® CFX® 2022.1 comparison based on AMD internal testing as of 02/14/2022 measuring the average time to run the cfx_10, cfx_50, cfx_100, cfx_lmans, and cfx_pump test case simulations. Configurations: 2x 32C AMD EPYC™ 7573X with AMD 3D V-Cache technology™ versus 2x 32C Intel Xeon Platinum 8362. Cfx_10 is the max result. Results may vary based on factors including silicon version, hardware and software configuration and driver versions.
- 2x AMD EPYC 75F3 (32C) performs up to ~1.98x the [~58% more on average across all tested workloads] LS-DYNA® crash simulation jobs/day PER CORE on 3cars than a 2x Intel Xeon Gold 6258R (28C) MLN-049.
- MLNX-001A: EDA RTL Simulation comparison based on AMD internal testing completed on 9/20/2021 measuring the average time to complete a test case simulation. comparing: 1x 16C EPYC™ 7373X with AMD 3D V-Cache Technology versus 1x 16C AMD EPYC™ 73F3 on the same AMD “Daytona” reference platform. Results may vary based on factors including silicon version, hardware and software configuration and driver versions.
- WRF version 4.1.5 forecasts per day comparison based on AMD internal testing completed on 2/17/2021 on a reference platform with 2x EPYC™ 75F3 (32C) compared to an Intel server on a production system with 2x Intel® Xeon® Gold 6258R (28C) processors. Results may vary. MLN-043
- Hadoop Sort SPARK 1TB comparison based on AMD internal testing on Cloudera 6.3.1 and VMware EXSi 6.7u3 as of 02-15-2021. Configurations: server with 2x AMD EPYC 7543 versus a server with 2x Intel Xeon Gold 6258R for 25.2% more [1.3x the] performance. TPCx-HS 100GB Scale Factor workload cannot be compared to published TPC results. Results may vary. MLN-051